Sunday, April 19, 2015

Week 4 - The End of Innovation

“We have to continually be jumping off cliffs and developing our wings on the way down.”
Kurt Vonnegut


Week 4 was an exciting week for sure. We ran the race of trying to incorporate the balance of creativity and critical thinking, as well as several fallacies associated with the innovation process and the contemplation of the end of innovation if we do not take action now during the Ted Talk with Robert Gordon.
Can Innovation save us? Innovation could come to the rescue; as Gordon discusses, the invention of electricity catapulted many offshoots of innovation and additional invention. For example, we went from using kerosene lanterns to electricity (Gordon, 2013). Electricity allowed for the invention of power tools and conveniences such as elevators and washing machines, stoves and refrigerators (Gordon, 2013)


We went from horses and buggies to the automobile, and eradicating waterborne diseases by developing running water and hygiene standards for better healthier consumption. We have already learned this semester that innovation and creativity do not solely rely upon the next “aha!” moment of monumental proportion. As Gordon mentions in his TED talk, he believes that there are four “headwinds” affecting growth include demographics, education, debt and inequality (Gordon, 2013) which are “…all powerful enough to cut growth in half…” and need innovation to make up the gap in the decline (Gordon, 2013).


As his discussion progresses, he touches on how innovation is powerful; if it becomes less powerful and less involved in the process of growth, then growth will be even less than half (Gordon, 2013). Without the captivation of the innovation process, “Americans can no longer expect to double the living standard of their parents” (Gordon, 2013). This means no matter how hard we work, will never be able to increase our worth or our actual income.


For example, demographics changed when women entered the workforce, but as we continue to age, so do the baby-boomers and therefore what are we replacing our workforce with? What is being lost as they retire? Additionally, the cost of higher education and inflation continues to stifle all demographics from being able to pursue their version of the American dream (Gordon, 2013). The actual college completion rate compared to the actual debt students carry to show for it is abominable. How can a college student realistically pay back hundreds of thousands of dollars in student debt by only making $35,000 - $55,000 right out of school due to lack of practical experience? This also ties into the mal distribution of wealth that primarily lies with the 1%’ers. Moreover, innovation and creativity come from more than just the “technological revolution” (Gordon, 2013) that many from my Gen-X roots have come to embrace, but also from a multitude of failures.


As we posted and discussed this week, innovation takes a great deal of work and resources. Being able to identify working hard towards innovation requires us to be able to measure the “…intensity, effectiveness and richness of collaboration…” (McKeown, 2014, p. 94). Some of the ways discussed regarding how to “…innovate more effectively” (McKeown, 2014, p. 89) requires measuring, calculating, monitoring, and reviewing during the process. 


As we found out, calculating talks about the inputs, resources and "direct investment” that is required to be invested in your innovative idea (McKeown, 2014, p. 89). Next, monitoring gives us the chance to evaluate how well something is being done in “real time” so we can decide what changes or tweaks become necessary as new information begins to unfold during our journey (McKeown, 2014, p. 89). Lastly, we can review “…the impact” of our efforts, as well as have the opportunity to evaluate if our strategy is working, has it helped shaped a “better future” and did we accomplish our purpose that originated our efforts from the beginning (McKeown, 2014, p. 89).


Additionally, in our supplemental readings this week, we were exposed to the common fallacies and myths regarding product development and innovation cycle process from a manufacturing perspective.  One crucial point that stuck out for me was that we have to be willing to accept constant change during the innovation process due to the “unpredictable” aspects regarding when tasks will be completed, what resources it will require and how long the learning curve will take to implement with our teams (Thomke & Donald, 2012, p. 86). This really hit home for me as I was reading because healthcare is very unpredictable, unlike most manufacturing businesses. There is a high variability from department to department, specialty skill set to skill set, as well as clinical requirements that do not universally apply to the vast majority of our departments here; we would not really be able to have broad stroke implementation of changes or procedures without a great deal of personification of needs – it would have to be innovation that was organic and flexible without a doubt.

As I uncovered in my research this week, Innovation comes from within each of us; it can come from failure or our need to make something easier or help a teammate out. Innovation comes from perseverance, “…focus, discipline and patience…” (Tobak, 2014) and a burning desire to identify challenges and remain committed to a solution focused culture. Leaders must understand that importance of critical thinking skills and their impact upon the entire process of innovation (Paul & Elder, 2008). Without purposeful thought, the cultivation of creativity would not only lack environmental support, but moreover, “…careful examination…” shows us that critical thinking skills and “…creative thought are intimately related” (Paul & Elder, 2008).

Developing creative thinking skills allows for employees to learn how to make better decisions, gives them the ability to approach challenges with greater day-to-day process understanding, as well as fosters a culture within our organization that “…values, nurtures, and rewards creative solutions” (Harvard Continuing Education, 2014-15). One area, originally that I had never thought of in great detail, is the idea that “…too much management strangles innovation…” (Gobble, 2012) and as another classmate pointed out, "When it all comes down to it, however, innovation may be a simply as thinking differently and adjusting our behaviors to accommodate the difference" (Zeitz, 2015).

As Gordon jokes, we get one, and only one, of two options. If we had a choice to keep everything that had been invented in the world up to about ten years ago, like running water, heat, electricity, and some modern conveniences like Google and Wikipedia (Gordon, 2013) or we can select option two which would include things like Facebook but then go back to using an “outhouse” which would we benefit more from? His underlying message is being able to uncover the value these give us in proportion to the future we wish to create. Our challenge as leaders and agents of change is being able to at least “match” what has already been achieved by transforming and redirecting our perceptions for what brings value to us in the future. I am willing to give up my iPhone to keep my running water and car! Just because something is new and trendy, has already proven that it doesn’t mean it is the best long-term solution for everyone.
Until we blog again!

References
Gobble, M. M. (2012). Motivating Innovation. Research Technology Management, 67.
Gordon, R. (2013, February). Robert Gordon: The death of innovation, the end of growth. Retrieved from TED.com: http://www.ted.com/talks/robert_gordon_the_death_of_innovation_the_end_of_growth?nolanguage=en%29#t-59680
Harvard Continuing Education. (2014-15). Creative Thinking: Innovative Solutions to Complex Challenges. Retrieved from Harvard.edu: http://www.dce.harvard.edu/professional/programs/creative-thinking-innovative-solutions-complex-challenges?gclid=Cj0KEQjwpM2pBRChsZCzm_CU0t4BEiQAxDVFmhCRhexEgq67ZM_Km2Hr9ob5xAXy88bsO30VnmIHckcaAlkk8P8HAQ
McKeown, M. (2014). The Innovation Book. Harlow: Maverick & Strong Limited.
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2008, June 08). Critical and Creative. Retrieved from Critical Thinking.org: http://www.criticalthinking.org/files/CCThink_6.12.08.pdf
Tobak, S. (2014, October 16). Where Does Innovation Come From? Retrieved from Entrepreneur.com: http://www.entrepreneur.com/article/238545
Zeitz, A. (2015, April 13). A642.4.2.DQ - The hard work of innovation. Retrieved from ERAU.edu: https://erau.instructure.com/courses/14127/discussion_topics/48354

No comments:

Post a Comment